Enhancements: Add additional validation to Volume Snapshot objects

Created on 17 Jul 2020  ·  13Comments  ·  Source: kubernetes/enhancements

Enhancement Description

_Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently._

sistorage stagstable trackeout-of-tree

All 13 comments

/sig storage

Hi @AndiLi99

Enhancements Lead here. Will this be graduating in 1.20?

Thanks!
Kirsten

Hi!

This feature is targeting 1.20 for GA. cc @msau42

See also #177

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice,

This goes together with https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/177.

Thanks!
Xing

@xing-yang should we combine the 2 enhancements and treat this as a requirement for the snapshots feature?

@xing-yang should we combine the 2 enhancements and treat this as a requirement for the snapshots feature?

Yes, that makes sense.

@kikisdeliveryservice, this enhancement is a component of #177. Can we just use 177 to track instead of tracking them separately? Thanks!

Hi @xing-yang

Just to clarify this issue 1900 (which was going straight to stable) is essentially the GA step (and graduation criteria, etc...) for 177?

Thanks!

Just to clarify this issue 1900 (which was going straight to stable) is essentially the GA step (and graduation criteria, etc...) for 177?

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice, this is one important step we need before moving 177 to GA. There are other things that are required before moving to GA and they are tracked already by 177.

Thanks!

Hi @xing-yang

I gave it some thought and the current setup is confusing and difficult to track.

You put the KEP for this (which uses the old format): https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-storage/177-volume-snapshot/tighten-validation-webhook-crd.md in the dir for 177 https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-storage/177-volume-snapshot

Note: the KEP in 177 uses the old format here: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-storage/177-volume-snapshot/README.md

My suggestion:

The above would make it very clear that 177 is dependent on this KEP but also allow us to properly track both and have the dirs set up correctly.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any assistance!! As a note Enhancements Freeze is October 6th.

Best,
Kirsten

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice,

Sure, I'll sort out the dir structure following the new format.

Thanks,
Xing

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice,

I submitted a PR here to sort out the dir structure for these two enhancement issues:
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/1994

Actually the work needed for #1900 will happen out-of-tree, so this can be tracked as tracked/out-of-tree.
While the issue #177 includes in-tree components so that needs to be tracked as tracked/yes.

Will this be more clear?

It looks great @xing-yang definitely more clear. Thanks for doing this!! 👍 😄

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

povsister picture povsister  ·  5Comments

wojtek-t picture wojtek-t  ·  12Comments

justinsb picture justinsb  ·  11Comments

wlan0 picture wlan0  ·  9Comments

sparciii picture sparciii  ·  13Comments