Runtime: [mscorlib] Moving more of the String functions to managed code

Created on 1 May 2016  ·  3Comments  ·  Source: dotnet/runtime

As it stands, many 'high-level' string functions like IndexOf, LastIndexOf, Replace etc. are implemented natively when they could be written in managed code. I noticed this was done with one of the string.Replace overloads in f007485, so maybe it would be good to do this to make the code more accessible to newcomers, if they aren't familiar with how the C++ code maps to C#.

area-System.Runtime enhancement untriaged

Most helpful comment

We have looked into this in the past and moved everything that could be moved without significant perf loss. Moving more depends on having pretty good managed optimizations for all coreclr architectures.

This makes sense to consider only once RyuJIT or better codegen is available for all architectures that coreclr runs on (x86, x64, arm, arm64).

BTW: The managed implementations of all string methods are available in corert repo.

All 3 comments

We have looked into this in the past and moved everything that could be moved without significant perf loss. Moving more depends on having pretty good managed optimizations for all coreclr architectures.

This makes sense to consider only once RyuJIT or better codegen is available for all architectures that coreclr runs on (x86, x64, arm, arm64).

BTW: The managed implementations of all string methods are available in corert repo.

@jkotas Ah, so that's why the implementations in the corert repo are managed; since it's compiled AOT and optimized by the C++ compiler, they get better codegen than the JIT implementation which is still a work-in-progress for some of the platforms you mention (arm, arm64). Thanks for clearing that up, makes sense now.

Closing as from @jkotas response above there is nothing left to be done here. @jamesqo feel free to reopen if you think otherwise.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

EgorBo picture EgorBo  ·  3Comments

GitAntoinee picture GitAntoinee  ·  3Comments

jchannon picture jchannon  ·  3Comments

chunseoklee picture chunseoklee  ·  3Comments

omajid picture omajid  ·  3Comments