You can port openswan or strongswan.

http://www.vpnusers.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3056
IKEv2 will make me happy with my Lumia. :)

It would be really great if IKEv2 is added. SoftEther is a nice and mature project with userspace IPSec implementation, which is very useful in contailers like OpenVZ, where you can't just load kernel modules.

If you add IKEV2, I Could migrate from RockhopperVPN and Could connect my Blackberry.

@balu88, you can use strongSwan with kernel-libipsec, if you need userspace IPsec implementation (I suppose you use rockhopper only because of that).

@ValdikSS, I use Rockhopper because of its easy configuration and administration. But thanks for the info, didn't knew about the lib.
Von: ValdikSS
Gesendet: Montag, 25. August 2014 03:14
An: SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN
Antwort an: SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN
Cc: balu88
Betreff: Re: [SoftEtherVPN] Please add support for IKEv2 for IPSec VPN (#13)

ValdikSS [email protected] hat am 25. August 2014 um 03:14 geschrieben:

@balu88, you can use strongSwan with kernel-libipsec, if you need userspace IPsec implementation (I suppose you use rockhopper only because of that).

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/issues/13#issuecomment-53218933

@balu88, by the way, strongSwan has web-interface and pretty easy to configure (if we talk about openswan/libreswan) and is very thoroughly documented.

IKEv2 is very important for me or other blackberry and nokia lumia users. please do support for IKEv2

@ValdikSS are u talking about dumm? send link to strongSwan web-interface please.

@dnobori - thx for the great SE package. very awesome. do you have a quick start guide on porting strongSwan to SE?

@complexi https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/1/wiki/Manager

do you have a quick start guide on porting strongSwan to SE?

lol

@ValdikSS lol indeed. thx for the strongSwan link.

IKEv2 is the default method for VPN's in windows 7.

Lack of support is causing allot of issues

2015 If IKEv2 isn't supported bump to support it.

Support for IKEv2 would be good

+1 IKEv2

＋1 IKEv2

I agree IKEv2 support would be much appreciated.

+1 IKEv2

IKEv2 would be good for mobile applications, would open up a realm of possibility for native VPN apps for iOS.

Implementing individual cert for IPSEC and OpenVPN is IMNSHO more
important.
On Jun 12, 2016 06:24, "AlexCatch" [email protected] wrote:

IKEv2 would be good for mobile applications, would open up a realm of
possibility for native VPN apps for iOS. I

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/issues/13#issuecomment-225432452,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AARer2iSsbB6xupuA2-_78-PXl-dVOleks5qLAingaJpZM4BaQAb
.

Also came here to say it would be very nice to see IKEv2 support in the SoftEther project.

Yes please add IKEv2 support
+1

Yes please add IKEv2 support

Hi everyone. Just to let you know I needed IPSec/IKEv1 in tunneling mode, so I'm currently working on implementing it in SoftEther and actually investing time in that. Hopefully after that I'll find time to add IKEv2, doing a port from strongswan.
Here's my code (it is a WIP)
https://github.com/moatazelmasry2/SoftEtherVPN/tree/ipsec-tunnel

So if anyone wants to help with IPSec tunneling or with IKEv2 or just need to exchange ideas, I'll be glad to talk

Any update?

We can not create vpn connection on iOS programatically.

It supports only NEVPNProtocolIPSec or NEVPNProtocolIKEv2

At this point SoftEtherVPN is meanless for iOS Developers 🤒

Yes , no support for IOS ikeav2

And no news on adding or hint how to make IKEv2 work with SE setup?

+1

341

https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/issues/341

New maintainer needed

+1 ikev2

Please ikev2

not only you have done it ;)

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:46 PM, DevsChristopher notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hello,
We have done it! strongswan Ported to softheros.
We have own vpn service, and we using softheros.
We have Apps for Ios and Macos, so we implemented strongswan in SoftEther.
We can share it with some peoples if you will donate to our devs.

Christopher Palmer [email protected]

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/issues/13#issuecomment-329470726,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AN5lV1Zo2GjFikTWVEUChQmx7OAVBvQPks5siSBDgaJpZM4BaQAb
.

@macvk more info please?

share yum repository for centos for the proof , and what price ?
send info to me apps @ gotmail.in

Can't believe that guys are bargaining for a patch in an open source platform. Can one of the maintainers ( @dnobori ) "kindly" verify that selling a patch is not violating the license policy ?

+1 ikev2

Hi guys, please do not add a comment with +1 and instead use the thumbs up button on the first comment. This way it is possible to track how many people want this feature. Cheers

+1

Have you tested Android 8 with new version?

+1 need IKEv2

I would like to invite @rmrio to this thread as he already did some things of IKEv2

https://github.com/rmrio/SoftEtherVPN/tree/letsgo

+1 IKEv2

+1 IKEv2

+1 IKEv2

Any update on this?

+1

De : Macley notifications@github.com
Envoyé : mercredi 29 mai 2019 13:33
À : SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN
Cc : Olivier Hault (Level IT); Comment
Objet : Re: [SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN] Please add support for IKEv2 for IPSec VPN (#13)

Any update on this?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/issues/13?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABIS3YM7PSD5EJLZCM3BKR3PXZSXBA5CNFSM4ALJAAN2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODWPBCLY#issuecomment-496898351, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIS3YI5JHRKP52LI5ZBQUDPXZSXBANCNFSM4ALJAANQ.

+5

+++10

Holy molly, this is the longest running issue thread I have ever seen!
But indeed, I will add my +1 for IKEv2 as well.

Ikr! It's crazy that the developers haven't noticed it for +5 years!

Please add IKEv2 support... it's super important!

+1

+1

+1. IKEv2 is safer than IKE. If possible, use IKEv2 only, do not use IKE.

+1

+1

+1, 6 years still no IKEv2

IKEv2 does not happen because of adding +1

someone has to write code

+1

De : Ilya Shipitsin notifications@github.com
Envoyé : mardi 5 mai 2020 18:15
À : SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN SoftEtherVPN@noreply.github.com
Cc : Olivier Hault (Level IT) olivier.hault@level-it.be; Comment comment@noreply.github.com
Objet : Re: [SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN] Please add support for IKEv2 for IPSec VPN (#13)

IKEv2 does not happen because of adding +1

someone has to write code

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/issues/13#issuecomment-624151717, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIS3YIGDVBRSHXDEKXPUS3RQA3TRANCNFSM4ALJAANQ.

IKEv2 does not happen because of adding +1
someone has to write code

+1

I need this feature to connect my UDM-Pro to SE server. Would be really greatful if you manage to do it.

+1

@dnobori

We in NovaVPN attempted to implement support the IKEv2 protocol for the SoftEtherVPN. The work was not finished, despite this we want to share the results with the community.

What was done
Fully implemented support of IKEv2 protocol (Key exchange, create session and tunnel)
Removed Windows support (sorry guys)
Removed IPv6 support for simplicity

What does not work
Traffic is not routed to the Internet for IKEv2 clients. Probably its easy to fix issue.

https://github.com/NovaVPN/SoftEtherVPN

+++10