Been profiling my Terminal today and noticed that fasd
is considerably slower than z
.
z was added to my .zshrc with: .
brew --prefix/etc/profile.d/z.sh
fasd with: eval "$(fasd --init posix-alias zsh-hook zsh-ccomp zsh-ccomp-install zsh-wcomp zsh-wcomp-install)"
The results when using zprof
with them exclusively enabled was:
num calls time self name
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) 3 1527.75 509.25 83.55% 1527.75 509.25 83.55% _fasd_preexec
2) 2 107.40 53.70 5.87% 107.40 53.70 5.87% compaudit
3) 3 47.98 15.99 2.62% 47.98 15.99 2.62% precmd
4) 1 153.86 153.86 8.41% 46.46 46.46 2.54% compinit
5) 6 39.73 6.62 2.17% 39.73 6.62 2.17% _setup
6) 3 27.72 9.24 1.52% 27.72 9.24 1.52% preexec
num calls time self name
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) 2 44.18 22.09 48.69% 44.18 22.09 48.69% compaudit
2) 1 67.12 67.12 73.98% 22.95 22.95 25.29% compinit
3) 1 15.62 15.62 17.22% 15.62 15.62 17.22% precmd
4) 1 7.73 7.73 8.52% 7.73 7.73 8.52% preexec
5) 1 0.14 0.14 0.15% 0.14 0.14 0.15% _z
6) 1 0.26 0.26 0.29% 0.12 0.12 0.13% _z_precmd
It helps a lot to just use the simple setup: eval "$(fasd --init posix-alias zsh-hook)"
But still slow compared to z
.
num calls time self name
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) 3 316.83 105.61 47.56% 316.83 105.61 47.56% _fasd_preexec
2) 2 146.31 73.15 21.96% 146.31 73.15 21.96% compaudit
3) 1 228.45 228.45 34.29% 82.14 82.14 12.33% compinit
4) 3 36.87 12.29 5.53% 36.87 12.29 5.53% precmd
5) 3 35.78 11.93 5.37% 35.78 11.93 5.37% _setup
6) 3 24.23 8.08 3.64% 24.23 8.08 3.64% preexec
Since fasd is run on every folder change it's a fairly noticeable slowdown.
I suspect the main reason is that fasd
is called twice as an executable in preexec
. This overhead can be minimized if fasd
is sourced by zsh (source =fasd
should work in zsh).
Also, to make the comparison more fair, you can tell fasd and z to use the same database, since the fasd just use z's data format.
I looked at the code and it seems possible to condense two executable call into one. I'll play around with the code when I have time.
Any updates on this? I would love to use fasd, but right now it's just too slow.
inlining the --sanitize sed regex's into the function also helps somewhat, but it's still very slow.
im having slowdowns too using simply: eval "$(fasd --init auto)"
in .bash_profile.
@sindresorhus profiling sounds interesting. mind sharing how you do that?
@wamatt It's in the issue text.
I am also observing that fasd slows down my shell significantly.
I have eval "$(fasd --init auto)"
in my .zshrc
.
zsh 5.0.8 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0)
on OSX.
$ zprof
num calls time self name
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) 6 194,36 32,39 92,69% 194,36 32,39 92,69% _fasd_preexec
2) 6 5,96 0,99 2,84% 5,96 0,99 2,84% _powerline_get_main_keymap_name
3) 6 5,29 0,88 2,52% 5,29 0,88 2,52% _powerline_set_true_keymap_name
4) 24 2,40 0,10 1,15% 2,40 0,10 1,15% url-quote-magic
5) 6 11,82 1,97 5,64% 0,57 0,09 0,27% _powerline_set_main_keymap_name
6) 6 0,30 0,05 0,14% 0,30 0,05 0,14% zle-line-finish
7) 6 0,27 0,05 0,13% 0,27 0,05 0,13% zle-line-init
8) 6 0,19 0,03 0,09% 0,19 0,03 0,09% omz_termsupport_precmd
9) 6 0,18 0,03 0,09% 0,18 0,03 0,09% omz_termsupport_preexec
10) 6 0,09 0,02 0,04% 0,09 0,02 0,04% _powerline_set_jobnum
11) 6 0,06 0,01 0,03% 0,06 0,01 0,03% omz_termsupport_cwd
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) 6 194,36 32,39 92,69% 194,36 32,39 92,69% _fasd_preexec
Still slow in 2017 :)
The slowdown was the first thing I noticed after installing fasd, so I did some profiling too.
With my default ~/.zshrc
$ time (for i in {1..20}; do zsh -ic 'exit'; done)
================
CPU 87%
user 1.913
system 0.880
total 3.207
With z: source /usr/share/z/z.sh
$ time (for i in {1..20}; do zsh -ic 'exit'; done)
================
CPU 87%
user 1.837
system 0.970
total 3.213
With fasd: eval "$(fasd --init posix-alias zsh-hook zsh-ccomp zsh-ccomp-install zsh-wcomp zsh-wcomp-install)"
$ time (for i in {1..20}; do zsh -ic 'exit'; done)
================
CPU 83%
user 2.207
system 1.123
total 3.993
So z adds < 1 ms, while fasd adds 39.3 ms.
I don't know if this is still relevant, but using this snippet of code fixes the problem for me:
eval "$(fasd --init posix-alias)" # Anything you want enabled BUT zsh-hook
_fasd_preexec() {
{ eval "fasd --proc \$(fasd --sanitize \$2)"; } &|
}
autoload -Uz add-zsh-hook
add-zsh-hook preexec _fasd_preexec
from here
I suspect the main reason is thatfasd
is called twice as an executable inpreexec
. This overhead can be minimized iffasd
is sourced by zsh (source =fasd
should work in zsh).
Is that =
in the source statement meaningful?
I don't know if this is still relevant, but using this snippet of code fixes the problem for me:
eval "$(fasd --init posix-alias)" # Anything you want enabled BUT zsh-hook _fasd_preexec() { { eval "fasd --proc \$(fasd --sanitize \$2)"; } &| } autoload -Uz add-zsh-hook add-zsh-hook preexec _fasd_preexec
I don't see any performance difference if I go with the output of zsh --init zsh-hook
which is below.
Not sure if it's relevant but I save the below snipped in a cache file and then source that instead of doing an eval
over the output.
# add zsh hook
_fasd_preexec() {
{ eval "fasd --proc $(fasd --sanitize $1)"; } >> "/dev/null" 2>&1
}
autoload -Uz add-zsh-hook
add-zsh-hook preexec _fasd_preexec
Most helpful comment
I don't know if this is still relevant, but using this snippet of code fixes the problem for me: