Libseccomp: Q: backport patches from master to release-2.4 for v2.4.2

Created on 22 Jul 2019  ·  10Comments  ·  Source: seccomp/libseccomp

We need to collect a list of commits in master to backport to the release-2.4 branch for the v2.4.2 release.

prioritmedium question

All 10 comments

Candidates:

  • 0d73daf07490656130e0f5311ad12ca8818752c5
  • 3f214cbbbbd663dd4e7fe90638af4971b436ec00
  • d390edad9a8540c2e2dd0b12732cc8dd3fe1cc69
  • 5fc22428507ecea00ee9e2215d972777da9a99b6
  • 4bec773fb401433bbfbbef111a49e1d2acbc4fcf
  • ff7fc73bdf4602323ce320a2094c006c9c3e4d42
  • 2b406e3b274407ceef53fa3de9469cfbd0fd0ddb

0d73daf - Agreed
3f214cb - Agreed
d390eda - Agreed
5fc2242 - Agreed
4bec773 - Agreed
ff7fc73 - Agreed
2b406e3 - Agreed

I don't remember the details of this commit - 3570b5cf9acbd1711d417e08ec608eea7b83d416. Do we need to backport it?

I don't remember the details of this commit - 3570b5c. Do we need to backport it?

The release-2.4 branch includes the SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_LOG/log_enable attribute so we need to make sure we reset it properly. The SPEC_ALLOW/spec_allow attribute isn't in the release-2.4 branch so that will need to be dropped, but that is pretty trivial.

As a test of your new write access @drakenclimber, do you want to backport these patches and put together a PR for the release-2.4 branch; I'll give you the ACK (assuming all looks good), and you can do the commit?

As an aside, backports are simple, just cherry-pick the patches from the master branch (if you are using stgit, it's the stg pick command) and make note of any edits necessary. If you've got any questions, or run into any problems let me know.

Sure. I can give it a shot.

Here's the branch with all of the backported commits in it. I mentioned "Issue #161" in the last commit so that it would automatically connect to this thread.

https://github.com/drakenclimber/libseccomp/tree/issues/161

Thanks. Is there a reason not to create a PR for this?

Now that there are two of us, I think sticking with a _slightly_ more formal process is important to keep our (and the tree's) sanity :)

Thanks. Is there a reason not to create a PR for this?

Good call. I'll make a PR. It's been a rather long day :(

Sorry, I spaced earlier on your comment regarding 3570b5cf9acbd1711d417e08ec608eea7b83d416 - good catch on that one, I mistakenly thought it was from the list I put together :/

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings